My learning targets are as follows:
- Students will be able to debate the pros and cons of teaching evolution vs intelligent design/creationism.
- Students will be able to explain their personal stance on evolution vs intelligent design through a five paragraph essay.
- Students will be able to refute other students’ stances on the evolution vs intelligent design through writing rebuttal paragraphs.
My skeleton outline for this lesson goes like so (please note, this is going to be probably about two weeks worth of work at minimum):
- Read provided materials or a selection from these sources (yes, there’s lots)
- Annotate documents for facts, opinions, and explanations. (either paper copies or online annotation application)
- Randomly selected for which side they will debate.
- Partner with one person from opposing side.
- Each will write 1 paragraph with three references explaining why their idea should be supported.
- Read each other’s paragraphs, then create a 1 reference rebuttal to the opposing viewpoint.
- Work will be submitted in two separate documents.
- Students will then do a gallery walk of the unlabeled paragraphs, rating each on a proficiency scale:
- Exemplary
- proficient
- basic proficiency
- limited proficiency
- not met
- not yet competent
- **Note: This could be done using Google Forms. Create a random form with the both paragraphs, then a rating for each paragraph and a while. Responses could then be provided for the students before they write their position piece.
- Students will then write a position piece based upon their personal position after reading – supported by factual research.
The provided materials include the following documents:
Thank you for sharing! I agree that the district databases are underused and contain some great resources.
ReplyDelete